Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Overall, I enjoyed reading this book. Although the beginning was a little slow and the book itself is fairly dense, the topic that Saramago writes about is extremely interesting; he explores a topic that many others don't attempt to write about or imagine. However, I wish that the author created a different ending to the story. Yes, it may relieve some of the audience's anxiety that instant blindness will not occur, but after reading 326 pages of the novel and ending the way it had started, with people regaining sight, I was quite disappointed. I felt that I read all of the book only to come back to where I had started. It would have been much more interesting if Saramago wrote about how society adapts to blindness, whether society is strong enough to overcome an epidemic so devastating, or whether it'd collapse and people would live in an uncivilized and barbaric state like we once did thousands of years ago. This would be the ultimate test of human capabilities, organization, and progressive behavior that makes up our ever-changing society today.

2 comments:

  1. I too was disappointed in the ending of the novel, although it was what I expected. I predicted that at some point some, if not all, of the population would gain back sight, but I wish that Saramago had gone into more detail as to what happened after they regained sight. Did society go back to the way it was? Or was life as they knew it over? I suppose that Saramago addressed the conflict of rebuilding civilization and faith in the people in his sequel, "Seeing", but I wish he addressed it a little in the ending of "Blindness".

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a fair criticism. You've invested so much into the novel by the end, and for it to end that way is a little anticlimactic. However, Saramago's novel is much more of an exploration in answer to a question than a story, and that exploration really doesn't invite a progression of plot.

    ReplyDelete